GO BRIGADE GO!!...
Back to Our Home Page!...
Search for It!...
The Internet Brigade
Latest Netly News and Site Updates!....
Media and Upcoming Internet Brigade Events Across America!...
Enlist in the INTERNET BRIGADE!....
The Internet Brigade Network -- Join in the Battle!....
Join the Prayer Brigade!....
Subscribe to the INTERNET BRIGADE Email List!....
Our American Heritage Library...
The Internet Brigade BookShelf...
The Internet Brigade Message Board...
The Internet Brigade Committee of Correspondence...
Noteworthy Internet Brigade Email...
Compare the Candidates...On the Record...
The Internet Brigade Photo Album...
Contact Internet Brigade Headquarters!....

Official Releases from Buchanan Headquarters!...
Articles, Essays, Letters and Great Speeches ... by Pat Buchanan!...
Pat Buchanan on Our Issues...Our Cause...
Buchanan says what he means...and he means what he says!...
Did you hear what they said about...
Videos - Our Candidates , Our Issues...


BRIGADE COMMITTEE OF CORRESPONDENCE
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

More Letters...


The Unfair Obstacle

Date:   February 2, 2000
To:      Senator Joseph I. Lieberman

         A recent rule instituted by the FEC(Federal Elections Commission) will be imposed on the People's Election Process. This process is best implemented when it is open to ALL. This rule will seriously augment that process by an application that presents an unfair obstacle.

The rule essentially places a 15% acceptance level on candidates to be included in the Presidential Debates that are presented by the networks on a national level. This 15% is to be determined by a poll conducted by the networks. These same networks donate to the two entrenched political parties and recieve their remuneration by charging for the airtime used by the party candidates.

In that several levels of qualification have already been met by the Reform Party I feel this is a deliberate attempt to impede the right of the voting public to observe and decide on Presidential Office seekers. To inhibit this by prematurely assessing the individual using a polling method that has elements of tainting is unAmerican, unacceptable and shows an allegience to the status quo.

I emphatically urge you to reverse and undo this rule that represents an attempt to literally "LOCK" the door of access to the PEOPLE'S right to elect their own and govern using a just system.

In addition, the debates themselves are an integral link in the journey to presenting a candidate, themselves, and becoming "VIABLE". To deny the inclusion in the debates is to suppress that candidates right to free speech and expression. It is a known fact that no one has met the 15% criteria prior to debates other than the two entrenched parties.

Again, I urge you to give this matter your full attention and renounce this rule. Many of us define ourselves as independent thinkers and voters. So, why not include another choice in the debates? We are a nation of choices. Our debate process says it is not.

Rudy Urban - Manufacturing
Chester, Connecticut
urban@connix.com


T H E    I N T E R N E T    B R I G A D E
Established April 1995
47671 Whirlpool Square - Potomac Falls, Virginia 20165
Linda Muller - WebMaster - linda@buchanan.org
http://www.buchanan.org

Disclaimer