GO BRIGADE GO!!...
Back to Our Home Page!...
Search for It!...
The Internet Brigade
Latest Netly News and Site Updates!....
Media and Upcoming Internet Brigade Events Across America!...
Enlist in the INTERNET BRIGADE!....
The Internet Brigade Network -- Join in the Battle!....
Join the Prayer Brigade!....
Subscribe to the INTERNET BRIGADE Email List!....
Our American Heritage Library...
The Internet Brigade BookShelf...
The Internet Brigade Message Board...
The Internet Brigade Committee of Correspondence...
Noteworthy Internet Brigade Email...
Compare the Candidates...On the Record...
The Internet Brigade Photo Album...
Contact Internet Brigade Headquarters!....

Official Releases from Buchanan Headquarters!...
Articles, Essays, Letters and Great Speeches ... by Pat Buchanan!...
Pat Buchanan on Our Issues...Our Cause...
Buchanan says what he means...and he means what he says!...
Did you hear what they said about...
Videos - Our Candidates , Our Issues...


The Internet Brigade!

In The News - Our Candidates - Our Issues

REFORM PARTY OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
JOHN HAGELIN-SUE HARRIS DE BAUCHE

August 22, 2000

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

REFORM PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES:
OF AMERICA, an Unincorporated :
Association :
c/o Gerald Moan :
9219 East Shonto Lane :
Tucson, Arizona 85749 :
520-294-5450 :
:
Plaintiff, :
: CIVIL ACTION NO.
v. :
:
JOHN HAGELIN :
1950 Mansion Drive :
Fairfield, Iowa :
515-472-4096 :
:
and :
:
SUE HARRIS DE BAUCHE :
875 Stones Dairy Road :
Fieldale, Virginia 24089 :
540-673-1186 :
:
Defendants. :
______________:

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Plaintiff Reform Party of the United States ("Reform Party") by its undersigned counsel, Cooter, Mangold, Tompert & Wayson, P.L.L.C., hereby files its complaint against Defendants John Hagelin ("Hagelin") and Sue Harris DeBauche ("DeBauche") and as grounds therefor states as follows:

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

1. This court has diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C §1332 and federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1331, in that this matter arises under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 ["FECA"], 2 U.S.C. § 431, et. seq.

2. Venue properly rests in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391 (a)(2) and (3), and (b)(3).

PARTIES

3. Plaintiff Reform Party is an unincorporated association. Gerald Moan is the duly-elected Chairman of the Reform Party.

4. Defendant Hagelin is an individual and a citizen of the State of Iowa. Defendant Hagelin maintains an office in Alexandria, Virginia for the "Natural Law Party." Defendant DeBauche is an individual and citizen of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and resides in Fieldale, Virginia.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Reform Party Organization

5. The Reform Party is a national political party organization registered with the Federal Election Commission. The Reform Party is a minor party, which is defined as a political party "whose candidate for the office of President in the preceding presidential election received, as the candidate of such party, 5 percent or more, but less than 25 percent of the total number of popular votes received by all candidates of such office." 26 U.S.C. § 9002(7); 11 C.F.R. § 9008.2(d).

6. The Reform Party is governed by a Constitution that was adopted on November 2, 1997. The Constitution specifically states that "[t]he rules contained in the current edition of Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised, shall govern this convention in all cases to which they are applicable and are not inconsistent with any Rules, Bylaws, Constitution or resolutions adopted by the National Convention or National Committee." Art. XII. The Reform Party has not passed any bylaws.

7. The Reform Party Constitution provides for a National Convention, which shall be "the supreme governing body of the Reform Party at the National level." Art. III, § 9(a). Under the National Convention is a National Committee, which shall be "responsible for the conducting of the business and affairs of the Reform Party between sessions of the National Convention." Art. IV, §1. Under the National Committee is an Executive Committee, which shall be "responsible for the conducting of the day to day business and affairs of the Reform Party, between meetings of the National Committee." Art. V, §1.

8. The Reform Party Constitution also provides for the National Party Officers of Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary, and Treasurer. Art. VIII, § 1. Among other duties, the national Party Chair presides over meetings of the Executive Committee, National Committee and National Conventions. Art. VIII, §2(a). The Party's Constitution provides that the Vice Chair shall serve as the National Party Chair in the Chair's absence. Art. VIII, §2(b).

9. Pursuant to an Opinion and Order dated March 27, 2000, in Case No. 6:00CV00014 Member Case, and Case No. 6:00CV00012 Lead Case ("March 27 Opinion and Order"), this Court found that at a duly-constituted Reform Party National Committee meeting on February 12, 2000 in Nashville, Tennessee, Pat Choate was duly elected as Interim National Party Chair, and Thomas McLaughlin was duly elected as Interim Treasurer. Gerald Moan had previously been duly elected Reform Party Vice Chairman at a Reform Party National Convention in July 1999, in Dearborn, Michigan. Gerald Moan's position as Vice Chair was not disturbed by either the Nashville National Committee meeting or the March 27 Opinion and Order. Sometime in April 2000, Pat Choate was forced to resign as Interim National Chair (because of personal reasons) and pursuant to the Reform Party Constitution, Gerald Moan succeeded Pat Choate as Interim National Chair.

10. At the time of the Long Beach Nominating Convention, described below, Moan and McLaughlin possessed the authority and were bound by the duties conferred on the Reform Party National Chairman and National Treasurer by the Reform Party Constitution and federal law.

11. These powers and duties include the National Chairman's authority to "preside over meetings of the Executive Committee, National Committee and the National Convention and act on behalf of the Party to carry out the resolutions of the Executive Committee, the National Committee and the National Convention subject to the provisions of this [Reform Party] Constitution." Reform Party Const. Art. VIII § 2.

12. The powers and duties conferred by the Reform Party Constitution and federal law on McLaughlin include the National Treasurer's authority and duty to "have custody of the Party funds and . . . keep full and accurate records thereof in books belonging to the Party; deposit all monies and other valuable effects to the name and to the credit of the Party in such depositories s may be designed by the Executive Committee; prepare and file required federal reports; disburse funds in accordance with the resolutions of the Executive Committee, the National Committee and the National Convention subject to the provisions of this Constitution; report on the financial status of the Party at each meeting of the Executive Committee, the National Committee and the National Convention." Reform Party Const. Art. VIII § 2(d). The Long Beach Convention, August 2000

13. A Reform Party Executive Committee meeting was convened on September 1, 1999, during which the committee elected to hold the Party's 2000 Nominating Convention in Long Beach, California. The convention site was chosen by a two-thirds majority vote of the eleven-member Executive Committee.

14. This Court has previously ruled that the February 2000 Nashville National Committee meeting was a valid meeting of the National Committee. Opinion and Order at ¶ 36. At that meeting, the National Committee voted overwhelmingly to ratify the Executive Committee's decision to hold the Reform Party's 2000 Nominating Convention in Long Beach, California. Id. at ¶ 25.

15. Pursuant to the Constitution, a National Committee meeting may be called by the National Party Chair or by action of one-fourth of all National Committee members. More than 30 days prior to the Nominating Convention, more than one- fourth of the National Committee members called for a National Committee meeting to be held in Long Beach on August 8, 2000. Then-Secretary James Mangia acknowledged at the National Committee meeting that the meeting was properly called and he appeared at the meeting. The National Committee meeting was convened at 10:00 on August 8, 2000 at Westin Hotel in Long Beach.

16. As National Party Chairman, Gerald Moan called the meeting to order; and seated as National Committee members all persons who had been certified (as of August 2, 2000) as National Committee members on the then-official Reform Party website by then-Secretary Mangia. Approximately 160 National Committee members were seated.

17. Despite the fact that he had, just days before, certified the list of National Committee members, then-Secretary Mangia stated that approximately 120 members were challenged. The assertion of challenge was made without documentation or verification. A state by state roll was taken, and Mangia declared that there were only approximately 40 delegates in attendance and the absence of a quorum, asserting that anyone who was challenged was not there.

18. Pursuant to the Reform Party Constitution, the National Secretary has no power to make "rulings." To the extent Mangia attempted to do so, those attempted "rulings" were overruled by Chairman Moan pursuant to his powers under the Constitution. On an appeal, the body of approximately 160 National Committee members voted to overwhelmingly uphold Chairman Moan's ruling that there was a quorum of National Committee members present.

19. An issue subsequently arose as to which National Committee members could vote on the individual challenges. Chairman Moan ruled that every delegate could vote on any challenge, so long as it was not a challenge involving their respective their state members. Mangia sought a "ruling" from the parliamentarian as to which members could vote on the challenges. The Parliamentarian "ruled" that only the approximately 40 unchallenged delegates could vote. Chairman Moan ruled that the role of the parliamentarian, consistent with Roberts Rules of Order, was to advise the Chair, and that he had heard the advice of the parliamentarian and rejected it. Chairman Moan's ruling on that issue was appealed, and the body overwhelmingly upheld Chairman Moan's ruling.

20. Subsequently, there was a challenge to the Colorado delegation which was resolved by the body. Unhappy with rulings of the Chair and rulings of the body as a whole, Defendant DeBauche, Mangia, and those affiliated with them, declared the meeting illegal and left the room.

21. By leaving the room, Defendant DeBauche and those acting in concert with her, by leaving the room, waived the right to to challenge the seating of National Committee members.

22. The meeting proceeded to hear challenges from the floor. The body resolved all of those challenges thereby ending the credentialing process of the National Committee Meeting and the National Committee Meeting was then opened for substantive business. Included in the business portion of the meeting was a resolution by the body of the National Committee members that the resolutions of the Executive Committee dated from July 5, 2000, including the July 28, 2000 resolutions of the Executive Committee (one of which attempted to invalidate the candidacy of Patrick J. Buchanan), were void ab initio.

23. Acting as the body, the National Committee also reaffirmed the power of the Chair to appoint Committee Chairs over the objection of the Executive Committee, and affirmed Frank Reed as the Chair of the Credentials Committee. Further, the members validated the earlier election of Kelly Apt as the Southwest Regional Representative on the Executive Committee, and invalidated the prior Executive Committee resolution which had replaced Apt with Paul Truax. Similarly, the members approved Timothy Hallinan as the Midwest Regional Representative on the Executive Committee, replacing LuAnn Jones.

24. When its substantive business was concluded, the National Committee meeting was called to a close.

25. On Wednesday, August 9, 2000, the Credentialing Committee of the National Convention, Chaired by Frank Reed, was to meet to address the challenges to the delegates for purposes of the Nominating Convention. When the Credentialing Committee attempted to meet in its designated meeting room at the Long Beach Convention Center, persons acting in concert with Defendant DeBauche, including Dorothy Drew, entered the meeting room and refused to leave when requested to do so.

26. When Drew and the others with her refused to leave the room, Chairman Moan affirmed Credentialing Chair Reed's power to choose members of the Credentialing Committee. Reed and his committee thereafter abandoned the meeting room and conducted their meeting in a room down the hall, and the television cameras followed them to be alternate meeting room. Having lost their television coverage, Drew and her group left the room, joined up with approximately 100 supporters of Defendant Hagelin, and staged a demonstration in the hallway. This demonstration was eventually controlled by Convention Center security and the Long Beach Police Department.

27. Thereafter, Drew and her group set up a table in the hall, and declared themselves the credentialing committee.

28. The Nominating Convention opened on Thursday, August 10, 2000. While the Reform Party administrative staff was in the process of issuing credentials to delegates, the main convention meeting room was not yet opened. Defendant DeBauche, Mangia, and approximately 100 to 150 persons acting with them ("the DeBauche Faction") attempted to force their way into the locked room, which attempt was stopped by Convention Center security and members of the Long Beach Police Department. After that, the DeBauche Faction staged another demonstration, which was again controlled by Convention Center security and the Long Beach police department. Thereafter, the DeBauche Faction left the Convention Center.

29. The Nominating Convention was thereafter called to order by Chairman Moan. The body heard and resolved challenges to the credentialing, but the DeBauch Faction never made any attempt to attend the Convention or be heard on any challenges to the credentialing process or the seating of delegates. Thereafter, the Convention was open for substantive business without any further attempt at participation by the DeBauche Faction, who thereby waived their right to challenge any of the rulings of the National Convention.

30. Prior to the Nominating Convention, Reform Party members participated in a mail-in nominating procedure. Without knowing the results of that process, and as the supreme governing body, the official Nominating Convention voted to disregard the mail-in procedure, and instead nominated Patrick J. Buchanan as the Presidential candidate by a roll call vote of the Convention delegates. Ezola Foster was nominated as the Party's Vice-presidential candidate. Pursuant to the Constitution, the National Convention also elected its National Officers: Gerald Moan as Chairman; Frank Reed as Vice Chairman; Alexander as Secretary; and Thomas McLauglin as Treasurer. James Mangia was recalled as the Secretary.

31. Upon information and belief, the DeBauche Faction, and Defendants Hagelin and others acting in concert with them, organized a "rump convention" which was held across the street from the official Reform Party Nominating Convention, which was being presided over (as described above) by Reform Party Chairman Gerald Moan.

32. During the course of the rump convention, the participants obtained the mail-in ballots which resulted from the mail-in nominating process. The rump convention proceeded to count the mail-in votes counted, and Patrick J. Buchanan won by a margin of approximately 2 to 1. Upon information and belief, unhappy with that result, the rump convention simply invalidated every Buchanan vote, and declared Defendant Hagelin the winner of the mail-in voting, and purported to nominate Defendant Hagelin as the "Reform Party" Presidential candidate.

THE DAMAGE TO THE REFORM PARTY

33. Subsequent to the rump convention, Defendant Debauche and Defendant Hagelin, and others acting in concert with them, have embarked on a campaign to destroy the Reform Party, to control its communication apparatus, including what had been its "official" website, and to take whatever steps are necessary to destroy the candidacy of Patrick J. Buchanan and Ezola Foster.

34. The foregoing conduct is causing irreparable harm to the Reform Party. Because of the Defendants' control of the website, Chairman Moan is deprived of his ability to communicate with Reform Party members and the state Chairmen through the website reflectors. The Defendants and others acting in concert with them are issuing statements to the press and over the website that Defendant Hagelin is the "official" Reform Party Presidential candidate; they have also issued a statement on the website that:

No affiliated State Party may offer or place any other person or candidate on the ballot as a Reform Party candidate for the office of President or Vice President other than [Hagelin]. Any individual attempting to certify any other candidate is not acting as a legitimate agent of a Reform Party affiliates and their contents or actions have no force or affect.

In addition, in the State of North Carolina, persons acting in concert with the Defendants have contacted the state Election Commission to place Defendant Hagelin on the ballot as the Reform Party candidate. The Associated Press has reported that according to the North Carolina state elections director, the "state board could accept the Hagelin certification and wait for a court to decide which candidate is the nominee." Upon information and belief, Defendants and others acting in concert with them are making similar attempts throughout the country to improperly place Defendant Hagelin on the state ballots. As a result, the Reform Party and its rightful candidates, Buchanan and Foster, are being denied access to the state ballots to which they are rightfully entitled. If the Party and its rightful candidates are denied ballot access, the Party's status as a minor political party entitled to FECA funds is in jeopardy, which constitutes immediate and irreparable harm to the Party.

COUNT I

(DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS HAGELIN AND DEBAUCHE and INJUNCTIVE RELIEF)

22. Paragraphs 1 through are incorporated by reference.

23. Pursuant to the rules and Constitution of the Reform Party, on August 12, 2000, the National Convention nominated Patrick J. Buchanan as the Presidential candidate of the Reform Party; Ezola Foster was nominated as the Party's Vice- Presidential candidate.

The rump convention held by Defendants and others acting in concert with them was in violation of the Reform Party Constitution, and without legal force and effect. Despite the fact that Buchanan and Foster were properly nominated as the Reform Party Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates, the Defendants, and others acting in concert with them, are attempting, through control of the website, through threats to the state parties, and through the news media, to invalidate the candidacy of the rightful candidates, by falsely asserting that Defendant Hagelin is the Reform Party candidate.

As a result of the foregoing conduct, the Reform Party continues and will continue to suffer irreparable injury, as set forth above, if injunctive relief is not granted.

30. There is substantial likelihood that Plaintiff Reform Party will succeed on the merits of this action.

31. Denial of injunctive relief will cause greater injury to Plaintiff Reform Party than granting injunctive relief will cause to Defendants.

32. Injunctive relief will serve the public interest, in that it will prevent Defendants from misleading the public about the identity of the duly-nominated candidates of the Reform Party; it will prevent Defendants from harming the reputation of the Plaintiff, including its capacity to generate monetary contributions, and in regard to federally regulated funds, and it will allow Plaintiff Reform Party to meaningfully participate in the November 2000 elections.

WHEREFORE, the Reform Party seeks a declaration that Patrick J. Buchanan and Ezola Foster are the properly nominated candidates of the Reform Party; that the rump convention was a nullity; and that Defendant Hagelin is not the nominee of the Reform Party. Plaintiff Reform Party also seeks a Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary and Permanent Injunction directing Defendants Sue DeBauche and John Hagelin, and their representatives, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, any and all persons acting in concert with them, are hereby enjoined from acting as officers, authorized representatives, or candidates of Plaintiff, and shall hereby immediately cease and desist from any and all activities in such representative capacity, including, but not limited to:

(1) solicitation of donations on behalf of the Reform Party of the United States;

(2) distribution of Press Releases on behalf of the Reform Party of the United States;

(3) operation of a web-site on behalf of the Reform Party of the United States, including the site "reformparty.org", or any state- related or linked web-site;

(4) expenditure of funds on behalf of the Reform Party of the United States;

(5) solicitation of party members on behalf of the Reform Party of the United States America;

(6) efforts to have John Hagelin listed on state ballots as the official candidate of the Reform Party of the United States of America, or representing John Hagelin as the proper candidate of the Reform Party;

(7) making any use of the name of the Reform Party of the United States of America or any substantially similar variant or derivation thereof;

(8) making use of any logos, non-textual trademarks or service marks belonging to the Reform Party of the United States of America, and

(9) making any other oral, written or electronic communication in a representative capacity on behalf of the Reform Party of the United States of America; and for such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

COUNT II

(DECLARATORY JUDGMENT - INJUNCTIVE RELIEF)

25. Paragraphs 1 through 24 are incorporated by reference.

26. At the Long Beach Convention, and pursuant to the Reform Party Constitution, the National Convention elected its National Officers: Gerald Moan as Chairman; Frank Reed as Vice Chairman; Alexander as Secretary; and Thomas McLauglin as Treasurer. James Mangia was recalled as the Secretary.

VERIFICATION

Under penalties of perjury, the foregoing is true to the best of my knowledge and information.

Gerald Moan

Respectfully submitted,

COOTER, MANGOLD, TOMPERT & WAYSON, P.L.L.C.
________

Dale A. Cooter, #24373
James E. Tompert, #25883
5301 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20015
(202) 537-0700


Back to Our Home Page

T H E    I N T E R N E T    B R I G A D E
Established April 1995
47671 Whirlpool Square - Potomac Falls, Virginia 20165
Linda Muller - WebMaster
http://www.buchanan.org

Disclaimer