ario is not the only one to have recoiled in fear and loathing.
Media who have burbled all over Mario's locutions in class warfare found my
Houston speech "divisive," "hateful," and the old standby, "racist." Carl
Rowan told his co-panelists on "Inside Washington" it was the closest he
had ever heard to a Nazi address. Bob Beckel thought my remarks might have
been ghosted by Satan himself.
The savagery of the reaction - ongoing - underscores my point: As
polarized as we have ever been, we Americans are locked in a cultural war
for the soul of our country.
What is it all about? As columnist Sam Francis writes, it is about
power; it is about who determines "the norms by which we live, and by which
we define and govern ourselves." Who decides what is right and wrong,
moral and immoral, beautiful and ugly, healthy and sick? Whose beliefs
shall form the basis of law?
At Houston, William Rusher writes, America heard "the first rumbles
of
a new storm ... fast approaching the American political arena, [a storm]
that will quickly replace the old battles over the conduct of the cold
war." Indeed, the storm has already hit the coast.
The Bosnia of the cultural war is abortion.
The Republican Party, in platform and ticket, is "pro-life." I.e.,
we
hold abortion to be the unjust killing of a pre-born child. Bill Clinton's
party rejoices in Roe v. Wade. To the one side, the 25 million abortions
in 20 years are a testament to freedom and progress; to the other, they are
the benchmark of a society literally hellbent on suicide. The conflicting
positions can no more be reconciled than those of John Brown and John
Calhoun.
Whose side is God on? In an angry letter to President Bush, the
National Council of Churches wrote: "We need to be very clear that God
belongs to no one side, for we believe all belong to God." Mr. Bush's
effort to conscript Him, they wrote, is "blasphemous."
But was it blasphemous to enlist Him at Selma Bridge? Is the
Creator
truly neutral in the unequal struggle between his tiniest creatures and the
abortionist with knife and suction pump?
To those gathered at Madison Square Garden, a man's "sexual
preference" and sexual conduct, so long as it is consensual, is irrelevant
to moral character. To most of us in Houston, however, it is the
codification of amorality to elevate gay liaisons to the same moral and
legal plane as traditional marriage.
Americans are a tolerant people. But a majority believes that the
sexual practices of gays, whether a result of nature or nurture, are both
morally wrong and medically ruinous. Many consider this "reactionary" or
"homophobic." But our beliefs are rooted in the Old and New Testament, in
natural law and tradition, even in the writing of that paragon of the
Enlightenment, Thomas Jefferson (who felt homosexuality should be punished
as severely as rape).
Thirty years ago, both sides in today's cultural war shared the
belief
that homosexuals, be they 2 or 10 per cent of the population, had the same
constitutional rights as the rest of us, as well as a right to be let
alone. We still do. Homosexuality was not an issue then. What makes it
an issue now is the non-negotiable demand that this "lifestyle" be
sanctioned by law, that gays be granted equal rights to marry, adopt and
serve as troop leaders in the Boy Scouts.
Let me be blunt: We can't support this. To force it upon us is
like
forcing Christians to burn incense to the emperor.
But the cultural war is broader than two battlegrounds.
We see it in the altered calendar of holidays we are invited - nay,
instructed - to celebrate. Washington's Birthday disappears into
Presidents Day. States, like Arizona, that balk at declaring Martin Luther
King's birthday a holiday face political censure and convention boycotts.
Easter is displaced by Earth Day, Christmas becomes Winter break, Columbus
day is now a day to reflect on the cultural imperialism and genocidal racism of
the "dead white males" who raped this continent while exterminating its
noblest inhabitants.
Secularism's Holy Days of Obligation were not demanded by us; they
were imposed on us. And while Gov. Cuomo may plausibly plead ignorance of
the culture war, the Hard Left has always understood its criticality.
Give me the child for six years, Lenin reportedly said, quoting the
Jesuits, and he will be a Marxist forever. J.V. Stalin, who was partial to
Chicago gangster films, thought that if only he had control of Hollywood,
he could control the world.
Too many conservatives, writes art critic James Cooper, "never read
Mao Tse-tung on waging cultural war against the West. [Mao's] essays were
prescribed reading for the Herbert Marcuse-generation of the 1960's, who
now run our cultural institutions... Conservatives were oblivious to the
fact that ... modern art - long ago separated from the idealism of Monet,
Degas, Cezanne, and Rodin - had become the purveyor of a destructive,
degenerate, ugly, pornographic, Marxist, anti-American ideology." While we
were off aiding the Contras, a Fifth Column inside our own country was
capturing the culture.
In wartime and postwar movies, the USA was a land worth fighting
for,
even dying for. But the distance from "The Sands of Iwo Jima" to "Born on
the Fourth of July," from "The Song of Bernadette" to "The Last Temptation
of Christ," which paints Jesus as a lustful, lying wimp, is more than four
decades. Hollywood has crossed a cultural and religious divide - and left
us on the other side.
In Eddie Murphy's new film, "Boomerang," every successful black has
one obsession: having good sex, and lots of it. I left thinking this film
could have been produced by the KKK, so thoroughly did it conform to old
Klan propaganda about blacks being little more than sexual animals. From
"The Cosby Show" to "Boomerang" is straight downhill; it is to travel from
what is decent to what is decadent.
A sense of shame presupposes a set of standards. In the Old
America,
Ingrid Bergman, carrying the child of her lover, fled the country in
scandal. Today, she would probably be asked to pose naked - and nine
months' pregnant - on the cover of Vanity Fair.
Today, the standards are gone. Does it make a difference? Only if
you believe books and plays and films and art make a difference in men's
lives. Only if you believe ideas have consequences.
In The End of Christendom, the late Malcolm Muggeridge writes that
Dostoyevsky, "in his astoundingly prophetic novel, The Devils... makes his
character Peter Vekovinsky ... say, 'A generation or two of debauchery
followed by a little sweet bloodletting and the turmoil will begin.' So
indeed it has."
"Poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world," wrote poet
Shelley. Does it make a difference that school kids in LA, who never heard
of Robert Frost, can recite the lyrics of Ice-T and 2 Live Crew.
Where did that LA mob come from?
It came out of the public schools from which the Bible and Ten
Commandments were long ago expelled. It came out of drugstores where
pornography is everywhere on the magazine rack. It came out of movie
theaters and away from TV sets where sex and violence are romanticized. It
came out of rock concerts where rap music extols raw lust and cop-killing.
It came out of churches that long ago gave themselves up to social action,
and it came out of families that never existed.
When the Rodney King verdict came down, and the rage boiled with,
these young men had no answer within themselves to the question: Why not?
Why not loot and burn? Why not settle accounts with the Koreans? Why not
lynch somebody - and get even for Rodney King?
The secularists who have captured our culture have substituted a
New
Age Gospel, with its governing axioms: There are no absolute values in the
universe; there are no fixed and objective standards of right and wrong.
There is no God. It all begins here and it ends here. Every man lives by
his own moral code. Do your own thing. Well, the mob took them at their
word, and did its own thing.
"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to prosperity,"
Washington said, "religion and morality are indispensable supports. In
vain would that man seek the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to
subvert these great pillars of human happiness."
Look at the works of "art" that ignited the controversy at the
National Endowment. Almost all were desecrations of Christian images.
Andreas Serrano submerged a crucifix in a vat of his own urine. Robert
Mapplethorpe took a statue of the Virgin Mother of God and twisted it into
a bloody tie rack.
Writing in an art catalog funded by NEA, an AIDS activist called
Cardinal John O'Connor a "fat cannibal from that house of walking swastikas
up on fifth Avenue." That "house of walking swastikas" was St. Patrick's
Cathedral, subsequently desecrated by militants who spat consecrated hosts
on the floor at Sunday Mass.
Yes, Mario, there is a connection.
The cultural war is already raging in our public schools.
In history texts Benedict Arnold's treason at West Point has been
dropped. So has the story of Nathan Hale, the boy-patriot who spied on the
British and went to the gallows with the defiant cry, "I regret that I have
but one life to give for my country." Elsewhere, they teach that our
constitution was plagiarized from the Iroquois, that Western science was
stolen from sub-Sahara Africa.
The name Custer has been stricken from the battlefield where his
unit
fell. Demands are heard throughout the South that replicas of the Battle
Flag of the Confederacy be removed from state flags and public buildings.
The old iron Confederate soldier who stood for decades in the town square
must be removed; after all, he fought in an ignoble cause.
Slavery vs. freedom, that's all it was about, they tell us. But go
up
to Gettysburg and park your car behind the union center. Look across that
mile-long field and visualize 15,000 men and boys forming up at the tree
line.
See them walking across into the fire of cannon and gun, knowing they
would
never get back, never see home again. Nine of ten never even owned a
slave. They were fighting for the things for which men have always fought:
family, faith, friends, and country. For the ashes of their fathers and
the temples of their Gods.
If a country forgets where it came from, how will its people know
who
they are? Will America one day become like that poor old man with
Alzheimer's abandoned in the stadium, who did not know where he came from,
or to what family he belonged? The battle over our schools is part of the
war to separate parents from children, one generation from another, and all
Americans from their heritage.
Our "common difficulties ...concern, thank God, only material
things,"
FDR said at the nadir of the Depression. Our national quarrel goes much
deeper. It is about "who we are" and "what we believe." Are we any longer
"one nation under God," or has one-half of that nation already begun to
secede from the other?
That, Mario, is what the cultural war is all about.
