GO BRIGADE GO!!...
Back to Our Home Page!...
Search for It!...
The Internet Brigade
Latest Netly News and Site Updates!....
Media and Upcoming Internet Brigade Events Across America!...
Enlist in the INTERNET BRIGADE!....
The Internet Brigade Network -- Join in the Battle!....
Join the Prayer Brigade!....
Subscribe to the INTERNET BRIGADE Email List!....
Our American Heritage Library...
The Internet Brigade BookShelf...
The Internet Brigade Message Board...
The Internet Brigade Committee of Correspondence...
Noteworthy Internet Brigade Email...
Compare the Candidates...On the Record...
The Internet Brigade Photo Album...
Contact Internet Brigade Headquarters!....

Official Releases from Buchanan Headquarters!...
Articles, Essays, Letters and Great Speeches ... by Pat Buchanan!...
Pat Buchanan on Our Issues...Our Cause...
Buchanan says what he means...and he means what he says!...
Did you hear what they said about...
Videos - Our Candidates , Our Issues...


BUCHANAN CAMPAIGN PRESS RELEASES

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
January 6, 1999


BUCHANAN CALLS CPD DECISION 'BELTWAY CONSPIRACY' TO CONTROL PRESIDENCY

BOSTON, MA -- Today, Presidential candidate Patrick J. Buchanan released the following statement:

"The Commission on Presidential Debate's (CPD) decision to limit access to candidates who pass a high threshold of poll support - a threshold set by the dominant parties - is a transparent farce. Let's be plain: This is nothing but a Beltway conspiracy by the two Establishment parties to corner the market forever on the presidency of the United States.

"The Reform Party is a recognized national party. It is receiving federal funds for its convention and its national campaign. The idea that its two rival parties should have the power to exclude the Reform Party and its presidential candidate from the decisive event of the election of 2000 is absurd on its face. It is a manifest conflict of interest for them to dictate to the American people which presidential candidates may appear in the televised debates that will determine our next president. If this were done in the private sector it would be condemned as conspiracy in restraint of trade.

"What is the CPD but a front group for the two Beltway parties? Co-chairman Frank Fahrenkopf is an ex-GOP party boss who now earns $1 million per year lobbying for the gambling industry. Why should he and Paul Kirk, a former chair of the Democratic National Committee, be handed this near life- or-death power over the one party with a chance of ousting them both from power. The attempt of these two lifelong partisans to shut the Reform Party out of contention for the presidency is an affront to the American people and an insult to the idea of democratic debate and fair play. We will fight the CPB decision both in court and in the public arena. And we shall prevail."

-------------
WEB NOTE: The following is included on our Brigade website for your review.
-------------

MEDIA ADVISORY
Commission on Presidential Debates

WASHINGTON, D.C., January 6, 2000 -- Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) co-chairmen Paul G. Kirk, Jr. and Frank J. Fahrenkopf, Jr. today announced the candidate selection criteria to be used in the 2000 general election debates as well as the dates and sites for the debates.

Kirk and Fahrenkopf noted that after each of the last three general elections, the CPD had undertaken a thorough review of the candidate selection criteria used in that year's debates. After extensive study, the CPD has adopted a three-part standard for 2000 which is detailed in the attached document. "The approach we announce today is both clear and predictable," Kirk and Fahrenkopf said.

The CPD co-chairmen also announced four dates and sites for the 2000 debates:

First presidential debate: Tuesday, October 3, John F. Kennedy Library and the University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA Vice presidential debate: Thursday, October 5, Centre College, Danville, KY Second presidential debate: Wednesday, October 11, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC Third presidential debate: Tuesday, October 17, Washington University in St. Louis, MO Madison, WI and St. Petersburg, FL have been selected as alternate sites.

Established in 1987, the nonpartisan, nonprofit CPD sponsored and produced the 1988, 1992, and 1996 general election debates. The CPD also undertakes research and partners with educational and public service organizations to promote citizen participation in the electoral process. In 2000, the CPD, with McNeil/Lehrer Productions, will produce "Debating our Destiny," a two-hour PBS special featuring interviews with participants in presidential debates since 1976.

The CPD intends to make extensive use of the Internet in its 2000 educational efforts, building on its 1996 voter outreach program, DebateWatch 92-96. Details of the CPD '92s Internet activities, which will be supported by corporate and nonprofit entities specializing in interactive application of the Internet, will be announced in the next several weeks. Background information on the CPD 92s mission, history and educational projects is available on its website: www.debates.org. The CPD will collaborate with the Freedom Channel in its work.

COMMISSION ON PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES' NONPARTISAN CANDIDATE SELECTION CRITERIA FOR 2000 GENERAL ELECTION DEBATE PARTICIPATION

A. Introduction The mission of the nonpartisan Commission on Presidential Debates (the "CPD") is to ensure, for the benefit of the American electorate, that gene ral election debates are held every four years between the leading candidates for the offices of President and Vice President of the United States. The CPD sponsored a series of such debates in each of the past three general elections, and has begun the planning, preparation, and organization of a series of nonpartisan debates among leading candidates for the Presidency and Vice Presidency in the 2000 general election. As in prior years, the CPD 92s voter educational activities will be conducted in accordance with all applicable legal requirements, including regulations of the Federal Electi on Commission that require that debate sponsors extend invitations to debate based on the application of "pre-established, objective" criteria.

The goal of the CPD's debates is to afford the members of the public an opportunity to sharpen their views, in a focused debate format, of those candidates from among whom the next President and Vice President will be selected. In the last two elections, there were over one hundred declared candidates for the Presidency, excluding those seeking the nomination of one of the major parties. During the course of the campaign, the candidates are afforded many opportunities in a great variety of forums to advance their candidacies. In order to most fully and fairly to achieve the educational purposes of its debates, the CPD has developed nonpartisan, objective criteria upon which it will base its decisions regarding selection of the candidates to participate in its 2000 debates. The purpose of the criteria is to identify those candidates who have achieved a level of electoral supports uch that they realistically are considered to be among the principal rivals for the Presidency.

In connection with the 2000 general election, the CPD will apply three criteria to each declared candidate to determine whether that candidate qualifies for inclusion in one or more of CPD's debates. The criteria are (1) constitutional eligibility, (2) ballot access, and (3) electoral support. All three criteria must be satisfied before a candidate will be invited to debate.

B. 2000 Nonpartisan Selection Criteria

The CPD's nonpartisan criteria for selecting candidates to participate in its 2000 general election presidential debates are:

1. Evidence of Constitutional Eligibility

The CPD's first criterion requires satisfaction of the eligibility require ments of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution. The requirements are satisfied if the candidate:

a. is at least 35 years of age;

b. is a Natural Born Citizen of the United States and a resident of the United States for fourteen years; and

c. is otherwise eligible under the Constitution.

2. Evidence of Ballot Access

The CPD's second criterion requires that the candidate qualify to have his/her name appear on enough state ballots to have at least a mathematical chance of securing an Electoral College majority in the 2000 general election. Under the Constitution, the candidate who receives a majority of votes in the Electoral College (at least 270 votes), regardless of the popular vote, is elected President.

3. Indicators of Electoral Support

The CPD's third criterion requires that the candidate have a level of support of at least 15% (fifteen percent) of the national electorate as determined by five selected national public opinion polling organizations, using the average of those organizations 92 most recent publicly reported results at the time of the determination.

C. Application of Criteria

The CPD's determination with respect to participation in the CPD's first- scheduled debate will be made after Labor Day 2000, but sufficiently in advance of the first-scheduled debate to allow for orderly planning. Invitations to participate in the vice-presidential debate will be extended to the running mates of each of the presidential candidates qualifying for participation in the CPD's first presidential debate. Invitations to participate in the second and third of the CPD's scheduled presidential debates will be based upon satisfaction of the same multiple criteria prior to each debate.

CONTACT: John Scardino, Media Director (202) 737-7733 or
Janet Brown, Executive Director (202) 872 1020

http://www.debates.org/pages/news3.html

-------- 30 --------


Back to Our Home Page
T H E    I N T E R N E T    B R I G A D E
Established April 1995
Post Office Box 650266 - Potomac Falls, Virginia 20165
Linda Muller - WebMaster
http://www.buchanan.org

Disclaimer